“damaged in an under-pressure event.” doesn't imply an explosion. I would read that as something was damaged by negative pressure in a system designed for positive pressure, the wording is ambiguous enough that claiming it exploded without more information about the incident seems like jumping to a conclusion.
“damaged in an under-pressure event.” doesn't imply an explosion. I would read that as something was damaged by negative pressure in a system designed for positive pressure, the wording is ambiguous enough that claiming it exploded without more information about the incident seems like jumping to a conclusion.